STUDI APLIKASI METODE KEMIRIPAN REDAKSI PERSPEKTIF FADEL SALEH AS SAMARRAI: Tafsir Surah Al-Tin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v21i2.264Keywords:
Fadel as Samarrai, al Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf methode, miraculous, surah al-TinAbstract
This article intends to explain how Fadel as Samarrai applies the al Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf method in interpreting surah at-Tin in his book Ta'bir al Qurany. Fadel as Samarrai is a contemporary Arabic language expert who actively teaches on campus and social media. This literature study employs a descriptive analysis method and a historical-philosophical approach. This study shows that the book at Ta'bir al Qurany predominantly used the tafsir bi arra'yi method, which is very strong with the nuances of its lughawi interpretation. This study concludes, first, that the al Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf method tends to use the method of interpreting the Qur’an with the Qur’an. For example, as Samarrai interprets verse 6 of surah at Tin by referring to verse 3 of surah al-Asr and also explains the editorial of verse 25 of al Insyiqaq. Second, the al Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf method tends to accommodate many verse meanings. Third, the more observant and thorough a mufassir looks at the similarity of the editorial of a verse, the more linguistic secrets are opened that may be closed to others. The more the similarity in the editorial side of the verses of the Qur’an is ignored, the more negative stigma towards the language of the Qur’an is opened.
Artikel ini bermaksud menjelaskan bagaimana Fadel as Samarrai mengaplikasikan metode al Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf (persamaan dan perbedaan redaksi ayat) dalam menafsirkan surah at-Tin dalam kitabnya Ta’bir al Qurany. Fadel as Samarrai adalah seorang pakar bahasa Arab kontemporer yang aktif mengajar di kampus dan juga aktif di media social. Penelitian ini merupakan studi literatur yang menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis dan pendekatan historical-filosofi. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kitab at Ta’bir al Qurany secara dominan menggunakan metode tafsir bi arra’yi yang sangat kuat dengan nuansa tafsir lughawinya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, pertama siapapun yang menerapkan metode at Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf cenderung menggunakan metode penafsiran al Quran dengan al Quran. Contohnya, as Samarrai menafsirkan ayat 6 surah at Tin dengan merujuk ayat 3 surah al Ashr dan juga menjelaskan redaksi ayat 25 al Insyiqaq, analisa as Samarrai menyimpulkan bahwa perbedaan redaksi ayat sejalan dengan konteks surah. Kedua, menggunakan metode at Tasyabuh wa al ikhtilaf cenderung mengakomodir banyak makna ayat. Ketiga, semakin jeli dan teliti seorang mufassir melihat sisi kemiripan redaksi satu ayat, semakin terbuka rahasia-rahasia kebahasaan yang mungkin tertutup untuk orang lain. Semakin diabaikan sisi kemiripan redaksi ayat al Quran semakin terbuka hadirnya stigma negatif terhadap bahasa al Quran.
References
’Itir, Nuruddin. Ulum Al Quran Al Karim. 1st ed. Dimasyq, 1993.
Abdul-Raof, Hussein. “On the Stylistic Variation in the Quranic Genre.” Journal of Semitic Studies 52, no. 1 (2007): 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgl039.
Al-Rumi, Fahd. “Buhuth Fi Al-Tafsir Al-Mawdu’i,” 1998.
Al-Samirrai, Fadil Soleh. “Lamasat Bayaniyyat Fi Nusus Min Al-Tanzil.” Oman: Dar ’Imar, 2003.
as Samarai, Fadel Saleh. At Ta’bir Al Qur’any. Amman, Dar Amar. 4th ed. Amman: Dar Amar, 2006.
as Samarai, Muhammad Fadel Saleh. “Al Qillah Wa Al Kasrah Fi Al Quran Al Karim; Dirasah Dalaliyah” 129 (2019): 81–106.
as Samarrai, Fadel Saleh. “Ittisa’ Ma’ani Wa Al Siyagh Al Sharfiyah Fi Tafsir Al Kasysyaf.” Al Majallah Al Adab 106 (2013): 31–58.
Baco, Risna, and Ali Mahfuz Munawar. “Wajh Al-Munasabah Fi Surah Al-Isra’ Al-Ayat 18-22 ‘inda Ibn ‘Asyur Fi Tafsirihi At-Tahrir Wa At-Tanwir.” Studia Quranika 3, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v3i2.2763.
Baharuddin, Didin, Hamdani Anwar, and Euis Amalia. “The Epistemological Stucture Of Tafsir Iqtishadi (The Study of At-Tafsīr Al-Iqti Ṣādī Li Al-Qur’ān Al-Karīm by Rafīq Yūnus Al-Maṣrī).” Al Bayan; Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir 6, no. 1 (2021): 25–38.
Bustamam, Risman, and Devy Aisyah. “Model Penafsiran Kisah Oleh Muhammad Abduh Dalam Al-Manar: Studi Kisah Adam Pada Surah Al-Baqarah.” Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 2, no. 2 (2020): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v2i2.1695.
Davoud esmaeili dan Mokhtari, Akram. “Comparative Conceptology of the Story of Adam’s Creation in Surahs Al Baqarah, Al A’raf and Taha: The Function of Context in Focus.” Adab Al Kufa Journal 46 (2022): 403–26.
Hamayil, Abdul ’Athaillah. “The Quranic Style Trough Similarity and Contrast between Word Denotation and Meanings from Educational Perspective.” Jami’atul Quds Journal 34, no. 2 (2014).
Hidayat, Hamdan. “Pengaruh Nasakh Mansukh Terhadap Kodifikasi Al-Qur’an Perspektif John Burton.” Cendekia: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 6, no. 2 (2020): 166–91.
Hizkil, Ahmad, and Syihabuddin Qalyubi. “Surah Al-Qadr Dalam Tinjauan Stilistika.” Nady Al-Adab 18, no. 1 May 2021 (2021): 1–17.
Ismail, Nurhidayati and Hafizzullah. “Dirasah I’jaziyah Fi Tasyabuh Al Ayat Baina Suratay Al Baqarah Wa Al A’raf Fi Qishshah Musa.” Alfuad Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 63–73.
K. Farrin, Raymond. “The Composition and Writing of the Quran: Old Explanations and New Evidence.” Journal of Collage of Sharia & Islamic Studies 38, no. 1 (2020): 121–35. https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2020.0258.
Mir, Mustansir. Thematic and Structural Coherence in The Qur’an: A Study of Islahi’s Concept of Nazm. Michigan: The Univesity of Michigan, 1983.
Muhamad Hamdani. “Stilistika Bahasa Arab Dalam Al-Quran Ditinjau Dari Ranah Al-Ashwaat (Fonologi) (Studi Surat Al-Kautsar).” In Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 1–23, 2018.
Mulazamah, Siti. “Konsep Kesatuan Tema Al-Qur’an Menurut Sayyid Qutb.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 3, no. 2 (2014): 203–34. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v3i2.1156.
Nahla Nadeem. “A Call for a Collaborative Approach to Understanding Textual Coherence in Quran.” The Acupuncture 7, no. 1 (2015): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.13045/acupunct.2016045.
Ouledenabia, Youcef. “Al Manhaj Al Bayani Fi Tafsir Al Quran Al Karim; Tafsir Fadel Shaleh as Samarrai Namuzajan.” Al Majallah Al Adab 11, no. 3 (2020): 20–35.
Qaradhawy, Yusuf al. Kaifa Nata’amal Ma’a Al Quran Al ’Azhim. 3rd ed. al Qahirah: Dar al Syuruq, 1968.
Rahman, Syahrul. “Pro Kontra I’jaz Adady Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 25, no. 1 (2017): 34. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v25i1.2175.
Saleh, Thaha Farih. Al Ustadz Al Duktur Fadel Saleh Al Samarrai Wa Ilm Al Munasabah Al Quraniyah Min Al Nazhar Al Sadid Ila Thuruq Al Tajdid, n.d.
Sedghi, Hamed, and Moradi Zahra. “Subtleties of the Meanings of Similar Verses in the Quranic Structure, The Study of the Story of Moses (PBUH) in the Al-Naml and A-Qasas (the View of Fazel Alsamarai).” Research in Arabic Language, Document Type: Research Paper 12, no. 23 (2020): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.22108/rall.2019.112668.1161.
Sukhiashvili, Teona. “Moses in the Qur’an.” Journal of Religious and Theological Information 20, no. 1 (2020): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10477845.2020.1832361.
