RESPON ISLAM TERHADAP PERUBAHAN SOSIAL

Authors

  • Mohammad Deny Irawan SPS UIN Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v17i1.64

Keywords:

Ijtihad, Rasionalitas, Radikalisme, Sekularisme, Modernisme

Abstract

As a universal religion, Islam has promised social change in society. Even so, a number of Muslim and Islamic scholars have also admitted that Islam has all the conditions to rise and color the social life of the world community. This article will explain the Islamic response to social change in society, including the role of fatwa as ijtihad products. Religion and Social still get space in the community. At least there are 3 bargaining power positions that are given between religion and society, namely: Religious affairs are more dominant, community affairs are more dominant and compromise between religion and social society in the frame of religion and social frame. This certainly shows that religion as a response to social change as a win-win solution to community life.

Sebagai agama universal, Islam telah menjanjikan perubahan sosial di masyarakat. Pun demikian dengan sejumlah cendekiawan muslim serta Islamolog ikut mengakui jika Islam memiliki segala syarat untuk bangkit dan mewarnai kehidupan sosial masyarakat dunia. Artikel ini akan menjelaskan tentang respon Islam terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat termasuk juga perani fatwa sebagai produk ijtihad. Agama dan Sosial masih mendapatkan ruang di masyarakat. Setidaknya ada 3 posisi daya tawar yang diberikan antara agama dan masyarakat, yaitu: Urusan agama lebih dominan, urusan masyarakat lebih dominan dan kompromi antara agama dan sosial kemasyarakatan dalam bingkai agama maupun bingkai sosial. Hal ini tentunya menunjukan bahwa agama sebagai respon perubahan sosial sebagai win win solution kehidupan bermasyarakat.

 

References

Al-Bukhārī, Abī ‘Abdillah Muhammad bin Ismā’īl. Al-Jāmi’ al-Ṣaḥiḥ (Kairo: Maktabatu Al-Salafiyah, tt)
Al-Naysabūrī, Imām Al-Ḥāfidh Abī Al-Husayn Bin Muslim Bin Al-Ḥujaj Al-Qushayrī. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (Riyadh: Baytu al-afkār al-dawliyah, 1998)
Al-Qaraḍawī, Yusuf. Ijtihād Fi Al-Sharī‘ah Al-Islāmiyah Ma’a Nadhariyyatu Taḥlīliyyah fi Al-Ijtihād Al-Mu‘āṣir (Kuwait: Dāru al-qalam, 1996)
Al-Raissouni, Ahmad and Muhammad Jamāl Bārūt. Al-Ijtihād: al-naṣ, al-wāqi’, al-maṣlaḥaḥ (Beirut: Dāru al-fikr, 2000)
Asad, Talal. “Free Speech, Blashpemy and Secular Criticisim: Is Critique secular? Blasphemy, Injury and Free Speech” The Towsend papers in the humanities (2009)
Chanman, Werner J.”Culture, Civilization, and Social Change” The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 2 (1962)
Esposito, John L. “Rethinking Islam and Secularism” quality data on religion (1998)
Fazalbhoy,Nasreen. ”Sociology of Muslims in India” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 32, No. 26 (1997):
Hallaq, Wael B. “On the Origins of the Controversy about the Existence of Mujtahids and the Gate of Ijtihad” Studi Islamica, No.63 (1986)
Haugbolle, Rikke Hostrup and Fransesco Cavatorta. “Beyond Ghannouchi: Islamism and Social Cange in Tunisia” Middle East Report, No. 262, Pull of the Possible (2012)
Khan, Ali. “The reopening of the Islamic Code: The Second Era of Ijithad” University of St. Thomas Law Journal vol.1:1 (2003)
Mahfuddin, Agus. “Ijithad Kontemprorer Yusuf Al-Qaradawi dalam pengembangan hukum Islam” Religi: Jurnal Studi Islam volume 5, Nomor 1 (2014)
Mudzhar, M. Atho'. “Pengaturan kebebasan beragama dan penodaaan agama di Indonesia dan berbagai negara” kajian putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.140/PUU-VII/2009 (2010)
Muhammad, Yaḥya. Al-ijtihād wa al-taqlīd wa al-itibā’ wa al-nadhar (Beirut: Al-Intishār al-‘arabīy, 2000)
Muslehuddin, Muhammad. ”Islamic Law and Social Change” Islamic Studies, Vol.21, No. 1 (1982)
Pranowo, M. Bambang. Memahami Islam Jawa (Jakarta: Pustaka Alvabet, 2011) cet. 2
Rahman,Fazlur. “Islam and Sosical Justice” Pakistan Forum, vol. 1, No. 1 (1970)
Schacht, Josep. Introduction of to Islamic law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)

Downloads

Published

2019-03-15

How to Cite

Deny Irawan, M. (2019). RESPON ISLAM TERHADAP PERUBAHAN SOSIAL. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 17(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v17i1.64